4.7 Article

Automatic grading of human blastocysts from time-lapse imaging

Journal

COMPUTERS IN BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE
Volume 115, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2019.103494

Keywords

Time-lapse imaging; Automated blastocyst grading; Inner cell mass; Trophectoderm; Ordinal regression

Funding

  1. Innovation Fund Denmark (IFD) [7039-00068B]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Blastocyst morphology is a predictive marker for implantation success of in vitro fertilized human embryos. Morphology grading is therefore commonly used to select the embryo with the highest implantation potential. One of the challenges, however, is that morphology grading can be highly subjective when performed manually by embryologists. Grading systems generally discretize a continuous scale of low to high score, resulting in floating and unclear boundaries between grading categories. Manual annotations therefore suffer from large inter-and intra-observer variances. Method: In this paper, we propose a method based on deep learning to automatically grade the morphological appearance of human blastocysts from time-lapse imaging. A convolutional neural network is trained to jointly predict inner cell mass (ICM) and trophectoderm (TE) grades from a single image frame, and a recurrent neural network is applied on top to incorporate temporal information of the expanding blastocysts from multiple frames. Results: Results showed that the method achieved above human-level accuracies when evaluated on majority votes from an independent test set labeled by multiple embryologists. Furthermore, when evaluating implantation rates for embryos grouped by morphology grades, human embryologists and our method had a similar correlation between predicted embryo quality and pregnancy outcome. Conclusions: The proposed method has shown improved performance of predicting ICM and TE grades on human blastocysts when utilizing temporal information available with time-lapse imaging. The algorithm is considered at least on par with human embryologists on quality estimation, as it performed better than the average human embryologist at ICM and TE prediction and provided a slightly better correlation between predicted embryo quality and implantability than human embryologists.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available