4.7 Article

Modelling and experimental validation on drilling delamination of aramid fiber reinforced plastic composites

Journal

COMPOSITE STRUCTURES
Volume 236, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.111907

Keywords

AFRP composites; Drilling; Delamination; Critical thrust force; Analytical model

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51705362]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Tianjin [18JCQNJC75600]
  3. Science & Technology Development Fund of Tianjin Education Commission for Higher Education [2017KJ081]
  4. European Union [734272]
  5. Chinese Scholarship Council [201808120102]
  6. Marie Curie Actions (MSCA) [734272] Funding Source: Marie Curie Actions (MSCA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aramid fiber reinforced plastic (AFRP) composites have been widely used in aerospace, military, and automotive industries. The common drilling process deployed for AFRP manufacturing can induce delamination that drastically deteriorate the mechanical performance and fatigue lives of the drilled AFRP components, therefore, establishing an accurate delamination model is desirable for delamination suppression and hole quality optimization. However, existing delamination models sum up all loads of the chisel edge and cuffing lips act on the uncut plies under the chisel edge algebraically, which does not represent the true contact conditions. In this study, a new delamination regime is proposed where delamination caused by thrust forces exerted by both the chisel edge and cutting lips have been considered. On this basis, a novel analytical model in the context of AFRP drilling is proposed for the critical thrust force (CTF) prediction. Double cantilever beam (DCB) and delamination tests have been performed to validate the new model and results show that our proposed model agrees highly with the experimental results where the thrust force exerted by the chisel edge accounts for 24% of the total load during drilling of AFRP.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available