4.5 Article

Effects of feeding and digestion on myocardial contractility and expression of calcium-handling proteins in Burmese pythons (Python molurus)

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.cbpb.2019.110371

Keywords

Specific dynamic action; Cardiac function; Snake; SERCA; NCX; PLB

Funding

  1. CNPq (National Council for Scientific and Technological Development) [301849/2014-5, 573921/2008-3]
  2. CAPES (Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel)
  3. INCT-FisComp (National Institute of Science and Technology in Comparative Physiology - FAPESP) [08/57712-4]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Pythons are important models of studies on postprandial metabolism because their physiological responses are exacerbated when digesting large prey. Prior studies of these animals have shown hypertrophy of the cardiac tissue 2 to 3 days after feeding, coinciding with the peak of the specific dynamic action (SDA), but the consequences of this remodeling in myocardial contractility have not been studied, which is the purpose of this work. Specimens of Python molurus were divided into two groups: a Digesting group (2 days after feeding, at the peak of SDA), and a Fasting group (28 days after feeding). When compared to the Fasting group, the Digesting group showed higher relative ventricular mass and calcium-handling protein expression such as sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+-ATPase (SERCA), phospholamban (PLB), and the Na+/Ca2+ exchanger (NCX). Digesting pythons also exhibited significant increases in the cardiac contraction force (Fc), rates of force development and relaxation, and cardiac pumping capacity. Therefore, the higher SERCA, PLB and NCX expression levels increased cytosolic Ca2+ transient amplitude, improving myofilament force. These changes are crucial to maintain cardiac output and a relatively high and continuous blood flow required by metabolic expenditure that occurs in postprandial animals.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available