4.7 Article

Chemiluminescence as a diagnostic in studying combustion instability in a practical combustor

Journal

COMBUSTION AND FLAME
Volume 213, Issue -, Pages 211-225

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2019.11.039

Keywords

Combustion instability; Chemiluminescence; RANS-LES model; Detailed chemical kinetics

Funding

  1. AFOSR project [FA9550-14-1-0029]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Prediction of combustion instability is essential in reducing development costs of large scale rocket engines. Recently, high fidelity CFD models have shown some ability to represent the stability characteristics of sub-scale experimental combustors. A challenge remains in acquiring experimental measurements of critical combusting flow properties, especially measurements of the unsteady heat addition field, for comparison to models. The chemiluminescent emission of radicals OH* and CH*, although commonly employed, may fall short due to its known dependence on pressure, strain rate, equivalence ratio, and turbulence level. Since these flame properties have large variations in an unstable rocket combustor, it is difficult to decouple the emission from all other variables except the heat release. Computations capture the local variations, and therefore can be used for a direct comparison with the measurements. The present study investigates the relationship between chemiluminescent species and heat release rate of the flame using simulations that employ detailed kinetics including the emitting species. This relationship is then compared to experimental spectral measurements captured with a fiber optic probe to check the validity of the model and to provide insight on the ability of the chemiluminescent light emission to indicate heat release in a high pressure unstable flame. (C) 2019 The Combustion Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available