4.4 Article

Bristol rheumatoid arthritis fatigue scale is valid in patients with psoriatic arthritis and is associated with overall severe disease and higher comorbidities

Journal

CLINICAL RHEUMATOLOGY
Volume 39, Issue 6, Pages 1851-1858

Publisher

SPRINGER LONDON LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s10067-020-04945-4

Keywords

Comorbidities; Fatigue; Psoriatic arthritis; Validation

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aims To (1) determine the reliability and validity of the Bristol Rheumatoid Arthritis Fatigue scale (BRAF-NRS) in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and (2) examine possible clinical associations of worse fatigue in PsA. Methods Study phase 1: BRAF-NRS scale validation cohort. A consecutive cohort of 70 PsA patients was recruited to complete the 3-item BRAF-NRS and the 13-item Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) questionnaires, alongside disease activity assessment. All patients also completed the BRAF-NRS questionnaire, 1 day later. Study phase 2: Identifying the potential clinical associations of fatigue by using BRAF-NRS (n = 283). A second cohort of 283 PsA patients underwent detailed skin and rheumatologic assessments including disease activity measures. Comorbidities were measured using the Charlson comorbidity index (CCI). Factors predicting worse fatigue as measured by BRAF-NRS were determined using regression analysis. Results In phase 1, 67 out of 70 patients from the first cohort had complete assessments. The internal consistency of BRAF-NRS as measured by Cronbach's alpha was 0.92. Test-retest reliability as measured by the intra-class correlation coefficient was 0.97. There was excellent correlation between the BRAF-NRS and FACIT-F score(r = - 0.83) (p = <0.001, 95% CI - 0.74 to - 0.91). In phase 2, using data from the second cohort of 283 PsA patients, possible clinical associations of worse fatigue were examined. On multiple linear regression analyses, the model predicted significant association of worse fatigue scores with low education status (p = 0.03), number of deformed joints (p = 0.01), not achieving minimal disease activity state (p < 0.001), higher CCI scores, and worse health assessment questionnaire score (p < 0.001). Conclusions BRAF-NRS is a reliable, reproducible, and valid instrument for measuring fatigue in PsA. Fatigue in PsA is associated with low education status and overall more severe disease.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available