4.4 Article

Glucocorticoid use is an independent risk factor for developing sarcopenia in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: from the CHIKARA study

Journal

CLINICAL RHEUMATOLOGY
Volume 39, Issue 6, Pages 1757-1764

Publisher

SPRINGER LONDON LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s10067-020-04929-4

Keywords

Bioelectrical impedance analysis; Glucocorticoid; Prospective observational study; Rheumatoid arthritis; Sarcopenia

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are at higher risk of sarcopenia because of joint dysfunction and chronic inflammation. The present study aimed to investigate the predictors or risk factors for developing sarcopenia in RA patients using the prospective observational CHIKARA database. We hypothesized that older age, higher disease activity, lower physical function, and glucocorticoid (GC) use are risk factors for sarcopenia. Methods A total of 100 consecutive RA patients participated in the CHIKARA study. Their body compositions were examined using a body composition analyzer. Laboratory data, disease activity, physical function, and treatment were investigated. Sarcopenia was assessed at baseline and at 1 year. Predictors or risk factors for sarcopenia development at 1 year were investigated by univariate and multivariate analyses. Results Of 68 patients without sarcopenia at baseline, 9 (13.4%) developed sarcopenia over the year. Univariate analysis showed that age (r = 0.28, p = 0.022), average GC dose over the year (r = 0.25, p = 0.043), and body mass index (r = - 0.28, p = 0.019) were significantly associated with the development of sarcopenia. Average GC use at >= 3.25 mg/day was a significant factor on multivariate analysis (odds ratio 8.81, 95% confidence interval 1.14-67.9, p = 0.037). Conclusions RA patients using GCs at an average dose >= 3.25 mg/day over 1 year were at higher risk for developing sarcopenia. Reduction or withdrawal of GCs may prevent sarcopenia.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available