4.4 Article

LPrognostic Impact of Programmed Death-ligand 1 and Surrounding Immune Status on Stage I Lung Cancer

Journal

CLINICAL LUNG CANCER
Volume 21, Issue 4, Pages E302-E314

Publisher

CIG MEDIA GROUP, LP
DOI: 10.1016/j.cllc.2020.01.013

Keywords

Human leukocyte antigen class I; Immunohistochemistry; PD-1; PD-L1; Tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to elucidate the prognostic impact of the programmed cell death protein 1/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) pathway on the surrounding immune microenvironment. PD-L1 positivity was associated with poor prognosis when there were few concurrent intratumoral CD8 cells; it was not associated with prognosis when an adequate number of concurrent intratumoral CD8 cells existed. Hence, our study suggests that the prognostic impact of PD-L1 expression was distinct to the intratumoral CD8 status. Background: The programmed death 1/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) pathway reportedly is as an important factor determining effects of immunotherapy; however, its prognostic impact is controversial, and its association with the surrounding immune microenvironment has not yet been elucidated. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 126 patients with pathologic stage I non-small-cell lung cancer. Patients with lepidic-dominant adenocarcinoma were excluded. PD-L1 expression was evaluated with immunohistochemistry correlated with clinicopathologic features and surrounding immune microenvironment status, including CD4, CD8, regulatory T cells, and human leukocyte antigen class I. Factors affecting prognosis were assessed by Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses. Results: Twenty-three (18.3%) patients were positive for PD-L1 expression. No significant correlation was observed between PD-L1 expression and the surrounding immune microenvironment status. The PD-L1epositive group had a worse prognosis than the PD-L1enegative group (5-year recurrence-free survival rates, 63.4% vs. 81.0%; P = .061). Among surrounding immune cells, intratumoral CD8 status had the strongest impact on prognosis (P = .12). In the intratumoral CD8-high group, PD-L1 expression demonstrated no significant prognostic impact, whereas in the intratumoral CD8-low group, patients positive for PD-L1 demonstrated a significantly worse prognosis than those negative for PD-L1 (5-year recurrence-free survival rates, 41.7% vs. 78.6%; P = .034). Multivariable Cox regression analysis revealed that 'PD-L1epositive and intratumoral CD8elow' status was an independent prognostic factor (hazard ratio, 3.80; 95% confidence interval, 1.22-10.5; P = .023). Conclusions: The prognostic impact of the PD-1/ PD-L1 pathway may be distinct according to concurrent intratumoral CD8 status. (C) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available