4.2 Review

Clinical Development of Immunotherapy for Deficient Mismatch Repair Colorectal Cancer

Journal

CLINICAL COLORECTAL CANCER
Volume 19, Issue 2, Pages 73-81

Publisher

CIG MEDIA GROUP, LP
DOI: 10.1016/j.clcc.2020.02.002

Keywords

Ipilimumab; Microsatellite instability high; MSI-H; Nivolumab; Pembrolizumab

Categories

Funding

  1. M.D. Anderson Cancer Center Moon Shots Program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most common cause of cancer-related death in the United States. Despite excellent prognosis for early stage disease, 5-year survival rates in metastatic disease remain low. A small subset of CRC is defined by a deficiency in mismatch repair (dMMR) resulting in high levels of microsatellite instability and are responsive to immunotherapy. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) targeting the programmed death 1 (PD-1)/programmed death ligand 1 axis and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 have been explored and show robust clinical outcomes with prolonged progression-free survivals in nonrandomized single-arm clinical trials. On the basis of these data, single-agent therapy with pembrolizumab and nivolumab and combination therapy with nivolumab/ipilimumab have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for metastatic CRC that has progressed after treatment with fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan. Ongoing clinical trials are exploring the use of these agents in earlier lines of therapy such as first-line metastatic therapy and adjuvant therapy for stage III CRC. However, resistance to ICIs does occur in a subset of patients and ongoing clinical trials are exploring novel approaches in these PD-1-refractory patients. The aim of this review is to outline the development and decision-making of ICIs in the treatment of dMMR CRC and to discuss ongoing clinical trials in this therapeutic space. (C) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available