4.7 Article

FLASH Irradiation Spares Lung Progenitor Cells and Limits the Incidence of Radio-induced Senescence

Journal

CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH
Volume 26, Issue 6, Pages 1497-1506

Publisher

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-19-1440

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Agence Nationale de la Recherche [ANR-14-CE36-0008-02]
  2. Comprehensive Cancer Center SIRIC program of Institut Curie [INCaDGOS-4654]
  3. Nanotherad IDEX (Paris-Saclay University)
  4. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (Investissements d'Avenir program) [ANR-10-EQPX-03, ANR-10-INBS09-08]
  5. Canceropole Ile-deFrance
  6. European Union's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Program under the Marie Skoodowska-Curie grant [666003, 642623]
  7. Prolific association
  8. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-14-CE36-0008] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: One of the main limitations to anticancer radiotherapy lies in irreversible damage to healthy tissues located within the radiation field. FLASH irradiation at very high dose-rate is a new treatmentmodality that has been reported to specifically spare normal tissue from late radiation-induced toxicity in animal models and therefore could be a promising strategy to reduce treatment toxicity. Experimental Design: Lung responses to FLASH irradiation were investigated by qPCR, single-cell RNA sequencing (sc-RNA-Seq), and histologic methods during the acute wound healing phase as well as at late stages using C57BL/6J wild-type and Terc(-/-) mice exposed to bilateral thorax irradiation as well as human lung cells grown in vitro. Results: In vitro studies gave evidence of a reduced level of DNA damage and induced lethality at the advantage of FLASH. In mouse lung, sc-RNA-seq and the monitoring of proliferating cells revealed that FLASH minimized the induction of proinflammatory genes and reduced the proliferation of progenitor cells after injury. At late stages, FLASH-irradiated lungs presented less persistent DNA damage and senescent cells than after CONV exposure, suggesting a higher potential for lung regeneration with FLASH. Consistent with this hypothesis, the beneficial effect of FLASH was lost in Terc(-/-) mice harboring critically short telomeres and lack of telomerase activity. Conclusions: The results suggest that, compared with conventional radiotherapy, FLASH minimizes DNA damage in normal cells, spares lung progenitor cells from excessive damage, and reduces the risk of replicative senescence.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available