4.4 Article

The lncRNA Fer1L4 is an adverse prognostic parameter in clear-cell renal-cell carcinoma

Journal

CLINICAL & TRANSLATIONAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 22, Issue 9, Pages 1524-1531

Publisher

SPRINGER INT PUBL AG
DOI: 10.1007/s12094-020-02291-0

Keywords

Renal-cell carcinoma; PCR; lncRNA; Survival

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNA) are involved in oncogenesis and tumor progression in various tumor entities. At present, little is known about the role in tumor biology of the lncRNA Fer-1 like family member 4 (Fer1L4) in clear-cell renal-cell carcinoma (ccRCC). The aim of this study is to evaluate the expression of Fer1L4 in patients with ccRCC, its association with clinicopathological parameters, and value as prognostic biomarker. Material and methods The expression of Fer1L4 was analyzed in the TCGA ccRCC cohort (n = 603; ccRCCn = 522, normaln = 81) and subsequently validated by quantitative real-time PCR in an independent cohort (n = 103, ccRCCn = 69, normaln = 34). Expression profiles were statistically correlated with clinicopathological and survival data. Results Fer1L4 lncRNA is overexpressed in ccRCC compared to adjacent normal tissues. Increased expression significantly correlates with tumor aggressiveness: high expression levels of Fer1L4 RNA were found in higher grade, higher stage, and metastatic tumors. Furthermore, Fer1L4 overexpression is an independent prognostic factor for overall, cancer-specific, and progression-free survival of patients with ccRCC. Conclusion Fer1L4 expression significantly correlates with aspects of tumor aggressiveness. Based on this impact on tumor progression and its influence as an independent prognostic factor, Fer1L4 appears to exert properties as an oncogene in ccRCC. As a prognostic tissue biomarker, further functional investigations are warranted to investigate Fer1L4 as a potential therapeutic target.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available