4.7 Article

Blood compatible heteratom-doped carbon dots for bio-imaging of human umbilical vein endothelial cells

Journal

CHINESE CHEMICAL LETTERS
Volume 31, Issue 3, Pages 769-773

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.cclet.2020.01.007

Keywords

Carbon dots; Fluorescent; Cell imaging; Erythrocyte; Blood compatibility

Funding

  1. National Key Specialty Construction Project of Clinical Pharmacy [30305030698]
  2. Research Funding of Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital [2018LY06, 2017LY08]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Carbon dots have unique advantages in biological applications owing to their excellent optical properties. However, the biosafety evaluation of carbon dots has limitations owing to cytotoxicity in vitro, and there is little pre-safety evaluation before in vivo and clinical applications. Whether the carbon dots are or not suitable for applications in vivo, evaluation analysis can be made based on hemolysis and changes in erythrocyte morphology. In this work, a green fluorescent N, S-doped carbon dots (N, S-CDs) were obtained by hydrothermal method, tobias acid, and m-phenylenediamine as precursors. N, S-CDs not only possessed excellent dispersibility, uniform particle size, high quantum yield (37.2%) and stable photoluminescence property but also retain their photostability and strong fluorescence intensity in the acid/alkaline solutions, different ionic strengths (NaCl) and under 365 nm UV illumination. Moreover, the N, S-CDs displayed low cytotoxicity and high cellular uptake efficiency in human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) and excellent blood compatibility to the erythrocyte. It is foreseeable that N, S-CDs could be further studied as a promising biological imaging agent in vivo. (C) 2020 Chinese Chemical Society and Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available