4.8 Article

A- and B-site Codoped SrFeO3 Oxygen Sorbents for Enhanced Chemical Looping Air Separation

Journal

CHEMSUSCHEM
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages 385-393

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/cssc.201902698

Keywords

air separation; chemical looping; density functional theory; sorbents; perovskites

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Energy [FE0031521]
  2. National Science Foundation [CBET-1510900]
  3. 2018-2019 Nagoya University-NC State Research Collaboration Seed Grant program
  4. North Carolina State University Kenan Institute for Engineering, Technology, and Science
  5. State of North Carolina

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Chemical-looping air separation has numerous potential benefits in terms of energy saving and emission reductions. The current study details a combination of density functional theory calculation and experimental efforts to design A- and B-site codoped SrFeO3 perovskites as low-temperature oxygen sorbents for chemical-looping air separation. Substitution of the SrFeO3 host structure with Ca and Co lowers oxygen vacancy formation energy by 0.24-0.46 eV and decreases the oxygen release temperature. As a result, Sr1-xCaxFe1-yCoyO3 (SCFC; x=0.2, 0.0<1.0) spontaneously releases oxygen at 400-500 degrees C even under a relatively high oxygen partial pressure (e.g. PO2=0.05 atm). Sr0.8Ca0.2Fe0.4Co0.6O3 exhibits a significantly higher oxygen capacity of 1.2 wt % at 400 degrees C and under a PO2 swing between 0.05 and 0.2 atm, when compared to the <0.2 wt % capacity for undoped a SrFeO3 (SF) and Ca-doped Sr0.8Ca0.2FeO3 (SCF). Electrical conductivity relaxation (ECR) study demonstrates that codoping of Ca and Co lowers the activation energy of oxygen diffusion and surface oxygen exchange by 26.6 or 137.9 kJ mol(-1), respectively, resulting in faster redox kinetics for SCFC than for SCF perovskite. The SCFC oxygen sorbent also exhibits excellent stability for 2000 redox cycles for air separation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available