4.5 Article

Continuous Radio Amplification by Stimulated Emission of Radiation using Parahydrogen Induced Polarization (PHIP-RASER) at 14 Tesla

Journal

CHEMPHYSCHEM
Volume 21, Issue 7, Pages 667-672

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/cphc.201901056

Keywords

coherent emission; NMR spectroscopy; para-hydrogen induced polarization; magnetic properties; RASER

Funding

  1. Emmy Noether Program metabolic and molecular MR [HO 4604/2-2]
  2. research training circle materials for brain [GRK 2154/1-2019]
  3. DFG-RFBR [HO 4604/3-1, 19-53-12013]
  4. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) [01ZX1915C, PMI 1267]
  5. Kiel University
  6. European Regional Development Fund (ERDF)
  7. Zukunftsprogramm Wirtschaft of Schleswig-Holstein [122-09-053]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) is an intriguing quantum-mechanical effect that is used for routine medical diagnostics and chemical analysis alike. Numerous advancements have contributed to the success of the technique, including hyperpolarized contrast agents that enable real-time imaging of metabolism in vivo. Herein, we report the finding of an NMR radio amplification by stimulated emission of radiation (RASER), which continuously emits H-1 NMR signal for more than 10 min. Using parahydrogen induced hyperpolarization (PHIP) with 50 % para-hydrogen, we demonstrated the effect at 600 MHz but expect that it is functional across a wide range of frequencies, e.g. 10(1)-10(3) MHz. PHIP-RASER occurs spontaneously or can be triggered with a standard NMR excitation. Full chemical shift resolution was maintained, and a linewidth of 0.6 ppb was achieved. The effect was reproduced by simulations using a weakly coupled, two spin-1/2 system. All devices used were standard issue, such that the effect can be reproduced by any NMR lab worldwide with access to liquid nitrogen for producing parahydrogen.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available