4.7 Article

Experimental and model study for fluoride removal by thermally activated sepiolite

Journal

CHEMOSPHERE
Volume 241, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.125094

Keywords

thermally activated sepiolite; Fluoride adsorption; Batch experiments; Column experiments; Adsorption models

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation (NRF) of Korea [NRF2017R1D1A1 B03030649]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The present investigation demonstrates the preparation of thermally activated sepiolite for effective removal of fluoride via adsorption from an aqueous solution. The thermal treatments on sepiolite were conducted at different temperatures (300-950 degrees C) for 4 h in an N-2 atmosphere, and the thermally activated sepiolite was characterized using a field emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM), X-ray diffractometry (XRD), X-ray fluorescence (XRF), a differential scanning calorimetry-thermogravimetric analyzer (DSC-TGA), and a surface area analyzer. Sepiolite that was treated at 950 degrees C was shown to have a higher fluoride removal efficiency than other temperatures. The fluoride removal was evaluated under different experimental conditions such as solution pH, adsorbent dose, reaction time, initial concentration, temperature, presence of co-existing ions, and reuses. The kinetic and equilibrium adsorption results were well described by the pseudo-second-order kinetic model and Langmuir isotherm, respectively, and adsorption of fluoride onto thermally activated sepiolite was endothermic and spontaneous in nature. The Langmuir maximum adsorption capacity (169.95 mg/g) was superior to the literature value. The thermally activated sepiolite was also effective in a continuous flow system for treating fluoride. Thus, this thermally activated sepiolite is expected to be used as an effective adsorbent for the removal of fluoride in water. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available