4.7 Article

Insights into the degradation and detoxication mechanisms of aqueous capecitabine in electrochemical oxidation process

Journal

CHEMOSPHERE
Volume 241, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.125058

Keywords

Electrocatalytic oxidation; Capecitabine; Detoxication; Degradation mechanism; Micropollutants

Funding

  1. National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars [51625801]
  2. Research Start-up Funds of DGUT [GC300501-20]
  3. Guangdong Innovation Team Project for Colleges and Universities [2016KCXTD023]
  4. Guangdong Province Universities and Colleges Pearl River Scholar Funded Scheme

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Electrocatalytic oxidation and detoxication of capecitabine (CAP) in aqueous solution were investigated with Ti/SnO2-Sb/Ce-PbO2 anode. The relative contributions of generated free radicals showed an increase in the pseudo zero order tare constants in the following order: (OH)-O-center dot (9.4%) < SO4 center dot- (24.2%) < O-2(center dot-) (53.3%). The operating parameters and solution matrixes, i.e. applied current densities, initial CAP concentrations, initial Cl- and NO3- concentrations, influencing the CAP degradation efficiency were evaluated. The kinetic rate constant of 0.1404 min(-1) was found within 7 min at current density of 10 mA cm(-2) and initial CAP concentration of 20 mg L-1, while the mineralization efficiency of 59.5%, mineralization current efficiency of 2.06%, detoxication rate to Escherichia coli of 55.5% were achieved at reaction time 90 min. The major degradation pathways of CAP were oxidation, defluorination and bond cleavage, following with the formation of carboxylic acids, NO3-, NO2-, NH4+ and F-. Electrochemical oxidation process based on Ti/SnO2-Sb/Ce-PbO2 anode is proved to be effective for elimination, mineralization and detoxication of aqueous CAP. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available