4.8 Article

Deciphering the Role of Quaternary N in O2 Reduction over Controlled N-Doped Carbon Catalysts

Journal

CHEMISTRY OF MATERIALS
Volume 32, Issue 4, Pages 1384-1392

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.9b03354

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. ARC Centre of Excellence in Future Low-Energy Electronics Technologies (FLEET)
  2. Australian Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nitrogen-doped carbon catalysts prepared from amino-functionalized metal-organic frameworks [amino-MIL-101(Al)] were investigated for the oxygen-reduction reaction (ORR) with special emphasis on elucidating the role of different nitrogen species (e.g., pyridinic, pyrrolic, and quaternary N) as active catalytic sites. Careful optimization of pyrolysis temperature of the amino-MIL-101(Al) leveraged the synthesis of the catalysts with or without quaternary N functionalities. This allowed us to investigate the type(s) of N species responsible for the ORR catalysis and thus address the conflicting results reported so far regarding the pyridinic and/or quaternary N as active sites for ORR. catalysis via four-electron transfer (4e(-)) pathways. Our findings suggest that the total nitrogen content in the catalysts does not influence the ORR, while the quaternary N sites exclusively catalyze the reduction of O-2 via the 4e(-) transfer pathway in both alkaline and acidic electrolytes. Catalysts containing only pyridinic and pyrrolic N were observed to be ineffective for the ORR. The experimental results were further supported by computational simulation using the gradient-correlated density functional theory which revealed that the dissociative O-2 adsorption (i.e., binding and cleavage of O=O bonds) is more favorable to quaternary N. Furthermore, calculations based on the relative surface potential energy, dipole moment, binding energy, and electron density indicate that the most stable structure of O-2 chemisorption sites could only be achieved on the quaternary N carbon.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available