4.8 Article

Atomistic Origins of the Limited Phase Stability of Cs+-Rich FAxCs(1-x)PbI3 Mixtures

Journal

CHEMISTRY OF MATERIALS
Volume 32, Issue 6, Pages 2605-2614

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.0c00120

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation [200020_178860, 200020-185092]
  2. NCCR MUST
  3. Sinergia grant EPISODE

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mixed cation perovskites, [HC(NH2)(2)](x)Cs(1-x)PbI3, (FA(x)Cs((1-x))PbI(3)) with x = 0.8, achieve high solar cell power conversion efficiencies while exhibiting long-term stability under ambient conditions. In this work, we perform density functional theory calculations, first-principles molecular dynamics simulations, solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), and X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) measurements aimed at investigating the possible phase stability of Cs+-rich FA(x)Cs((1-x))PbI(3), (0 <= x <= 0.5) mixed-cation materials as potential candidates for tandem solar cell applications. Estimations of the free energy of the mixtures with respect to the pure compounds together with calculations of the relative phase stability at 0 K and at finite temperature show that although the mixtures can form, the delta phase remains the thermodynamically most stable phase at room temperature. This is fully corroborated by solid-state NMR and XRD measurements and is in contrast to FA(+)-rich Cs/FA mixtures, where small additions of Cs+ are sufficient to stabilize the perovskite phase at ambient conditions. The atomistic origin for this contrasting behavior arises from an energetic destabilization of the perovskite phase on the one hand caused by the incorporation of a large cation (FA(+)) into the relatively small host lattice of gamma-CsPbI3 and on the other hand is induced by the lower degree of distortion of the host lattice. These observations allow us to propose a new design principle for the preferential stabilization of the perovskite phase over the competing delta phase.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available