4.6 Article

Applicability of a modified breakage and coalescence model based on the complete turbulence spectrum concept for CFD simulation of gas-liquid mass transfer in a stirred tank reactor

Journal

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE
Volume 211, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2019.115272

Keywords

Bioreactor; k(L)a Gas-liquid mass transfer; Energy spectrum; Population balance

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A generalized model for bubble breakage and coalescence is proposed using Computational Fluid Dynamics - CFD for considering the complete energy spectrum. An eulerian model and balance equations are simultaneously used to simulate the multiphase flow and bubble size distribution, respectively. The turbulent kinetic energy and its dissipation are calculated using the standard turbulence model k - epsilon. A semiempirical model that solves the second-order longitudinal structure function based on an interpolation function is coupled to CFD via UDF (User Defined Functions) code. CFD results are compared with experimental data obtained from Sauter mean diameter measurements at different bioreactor positions and stirred by a Rushton turbine. A reasonable prediction is obtained in comparison with the original Coulaloglou and Tavlarides (Break up) and Prince and Blanch (Coalescence) model. Further, the generalized model was extended to other stirring and aeration geometries using the same 10 litter tank bioreactor. The latter for evaluating strategies for overcoming gas-liquid mass transfer problems commonly found in bioreactors and a significant effect of the energy spectrum is reached in the geometries studied. The above, explained by the k(L)a oxygen transfer rate and bubble size determinations. It is numerically demonstrated that flow patterns and bubble size significantly influence the average k(L)a mass transfer in a bioreactor. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available