4.7 Article

Electrochemical nitrate reduction as affected by the crystal morphology and facet of copper nanoparticles supported on nickel foam electrodes (Cu/Ni)

Journal

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
Volume 383, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2019.123157

Keywords

Electrodeless plating; Crystal facet; Nitrate; Selectivity; Electrode potential

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan
  2. MOST [107-2221-E-110-001-MY3]
  3. US NSF IOA [1632899]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cu/Ni composite electrodes were prepared and studied for the electrochemical reduction of nitrate in aqueous solutions. Electrodeless plating technique, with tartrate as chelatant and formaldehyde as reducing agent, enabled the in-situ incorporation of Cu nanoparticles into the open-pore structured Ni foam to form Cu-Ni composite electrodes. X-ray diffractometer (XRD) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) revealed that the crystal facet and grain morphology of Cu nanoparticles was closely controlled by the plating time and played a significant role in nitrate reduction and nitrogen selectivity. Cyclic voltammetry provided information on the electron transfer between surface nitrogen species and Cu/Ni electrodes. Electrochemical nitrate reduction was initiated at the onset potential of Cu(0)/Cu(I) redox reaction over a potential window of -0.6 V to -1.2 V. The preferential Cu{1 1 1} facet orientation improved the electron transfer process. Batch kinetics studies at constant current and potential showed that specific adsorption of nitrate and nitrite on the Cu{1 1 1} facet was critical to efficient electrochemical nitrate reduction. Moreover, the conversion of nitrogenous byproduct was potential-dependent. Results showed that N-2 selectivity was high (55.6%) at low overpotential (i.e.,>=-0.6 V vs. Hg/HgO. At high overpotential (i.e,<-0.6 V) there was complete of NO3- reduction with NH4+ as major byproduct.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available