4.7 Article

Luminescence mechanism of Eu3+ ions doped NaYF4 nanocrystals via in situ time-resolved spectroscopy

Journal

CERAMICS INTERNATIONAL
Volume 46, Issue 8, Pages 11132-11136

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.01.133

Keywords

Nanocrystals; Stark-splitting process; Temperature-dependent spectra; Judd-Ofelt theory

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation of China [11604262]
  2. Shaanxi Provincial Research Plan for Young Scientific and Technological New Stars [2015KJXX-40]
  3. New Star Team of Xi'an University of Posts AMP
  4. Telecommunications
  5. Natural Science Basic Research Plan in Shaanxi Province of China [2018JM1052, 2018JQ1070]
  6. Natural Science Foundation of Shaanxi Provincial Department of Education [18JK0712]
  7. Open Research Fund of Key Laboratory of Spectral Imaging Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences [LSIT201810D]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper, we fabricated NaYF4: Eu3+ nanocrystals via a facile hydrothermal approach. By a technique of in situ optical spectroscopy, the luminescence kinetics of the NaYF4: Eu3+ nanocrystals were real-time monitored by a confocal optical microscopy system. It is discovered that the most intense emission peak of Eu3+ ions is at 615 nm (D-5(0) -> F-7(2)) that belongs to the electric dipole (ED) transition and its intensity is sensitive to the crystal environment. The D-5(0) -> F-7(2) emission band could appear obvious stark-splitting phenomenon during the heat process of the nanocrystals at 1000 degrees C. The luminescence mechanism of NaYF4: Eu3+ nanocrystals is analyzed by Judd-Ofelt theory. The special spectroscopic properties of NaYF4: Eu3+ nanocrystals at high temperature could have an impact on the optical properties of trivalent lanthanide ion doped fluoride materials and associated applications. Furthermore, this finding may serve as a promising and powerful technique to better investigate the PL mechanism.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available