4.4 Article

Persistent post-traumatic headache attributed to mild traumatic brain injury: Deep phenotyping and treatment patterns

Journal

CEPHALALGIA
Volume 40, Issue 6, Pages 554-564

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0333102420909865

Keywords

Concussion; head trauma; head injury; clinical management

Funding

  1. Rigshospitalet Research Foundation [F-23340-02]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective To investigate clinical characteristics and treatment patterns in persistent post-traumatic headache attributed to mild traumatic brain injury. Methods A total of 100 individuals with persistent post-traumatic headache attributed to mild traumatic brain injury were enrolled between July 2018 and June 2019. Deep phenotyping was performed using a semi-structured interview while allodynia was assessed using the 12-item Allodynia Symptom Checklist. Results In 100 subjects with persistent post-traumatic headache, the mean headache frequency was 25.4 +/- 7.1 days per month. The most common headache phenotype was chronic migraine-like headache (n = 61) followed by combined episodic migraine-like and tension-type-like headache (n = 29) while nine subjects reported pure chronic tension-type-like headache. The most frequent trigger factors were stress, lack of sleep, and bright lights. A history of preventive medication use was reported by 63 subjects, of which 79% reported failure of at least one preventive drug, while 19% reported failure of at least four preventive drugs. Cutaneous allodynia was absent in 54% of the subjects, mild in 23%, moderate in 17%, and severe in 6%. Conclusions The headache profile of individuals with persistent post-traumatic headache most often resembled a chronic migraine-like phenotype or a combined episodic migraine-like and tension-type-like headache phenotype. Migraine-specific preventive medications were largely reported to be ineffective. Therefore, there is a pressing need for pathophysiological insights and disease-specific therapies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available