4.5 Review

Cellular senescence and senescence-associated secretory phenotype via the cGAS-STING signaling pathway in cancer

Journal

CANCER SCIENCE
Volume 111, Issue 2, Pages 304-311

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/cas.14266

Keywords

cellular senescence; cGAS-STING; DNA damage; SASP; tumorigenesis

Categories

Funding

  1. Princess Takamatsu Cancer Research Fund
  2. Takeda Science Foundation
  3. Japan Science and Technology Agency [PRESTO/JPMJPR17H7]
  4. Vehicle Racing Commemorative Foundation
  5. Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development [PRIME/19gm6110023h0001]
  6. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [18K15073, 18K15254, 19H03507, 19J00796]
  7. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [18K15073, 19J00796, 19H03507, 18K15254] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cellular senescence is historically regarded as a tumor suppression mechanism to prevent damaged cells from aberrant proliferation in benign and premalignant tumors. However, recent findings have suggested that senescent cells contribute to tumorigenesis and age-associated pathologies through the senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP). Therefore, to control age-associated cancer, it is important to understand the molecular mechanisms of the SASP in the cancer microenvironment. New findings have suggested that the cyclic GMP-AMP synthase (cGAS)-stimulator of interferon genes (STING) signaling pathway, a critical indicator of innate immune response, triggers the SASP in response to accumulation of cytoplasmic DNA (cytoplasmic chromatin fragments, mtDNA and cDNA) in senescent cells. Notably, the cGAS-STING signaling pathway promotes or inhibits tumorigenesis depending on the biological context in vivo, indicating that it may be a potential therapeutic target for cancer. Herein, we review the regulatory machinery and biological function of the SASP via the cGAS-STING signaling pathway in cancer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available