4.7 Article

Comparable outcomes of nivolumab in patients with advanced NSCLC presenting with or without brain metastases: a retrospective cohort study

Journal

CANCER IMMUNOLOGY IMMUNOTHERAPY
Volume 69, Issue 3, Pages 399-405

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00262-019-02462-1

Keywords

Non-small cell lung cancer; Brain metastases; PD-1; Immunotherapy; Nivolumab

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective This study aimed to determine whether there is a difference in the efficacy of nivolumab in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) presenting with or without brain metastases. Materials and methods Patients with advanced NSCLC treated with nivolumab monotherapy were retrospectively analyzed. They were divided into two cohorts according to the presence or absence of brain metastases. The differences between the two cohorts in objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), duration of response (DOR) and overall survival (OS) were investigated, and the intracranial efficacy, including intracerebral objective response rate (IORR), intracranial disease control rate (IDCR) and intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS), were examined in the brain metastasis (BM) cohort. Results Seventy-three patients (32 with brain metastases and 41 without) were included. The ORRs of the BM cohort and the non-brain metastasis (non-BM) cohort were 25.0% and 19.5% (p = 0.574), DCRs were 53.1% and 56.1% (p = 0.800), respectively. Their median PFS were 2.8 and 4.9 months (p = 0.204), median DORs were 9.8 and 28.8 months (p = 0.003), and median OS were 14.8 and 20.2 months (p = 0.114), respectively. According to the Cox multivariate regression analysis, BM was not an independent prognostic factor. The IORR and IDCR of the BM cohort were 28.1% and 46.9%, respectively, with a median iPFS of 2.2 months. Conclusions The efficacy of nivolumab is comparable in patients with NSCLC presenting with and without brain metastases, but the results must be verified in large-scale prospective studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available