4.4 Article

Low serum exosomal miR-484 expression predicts unfavorable prognosis in ovarian cancer

Journal

CANCER BIOMARKERS
Volume 27, Issue 4, Pages 485-491

Publisher

IOS PRESS
DOI: 10.3233/CBM-191123

Keywords

Ovarian cancer; miR-484; serum exosomes; biomarker; prognosis

Categories

Funding

  1. First Affiliated Hospital of Yangtze University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: Ovarian cancer (OC) is one of the most common malignancy worldwide. Emerging evidences have demonstrated that microRNAs (miRNAs) play an important role in regulating the initiation and development of OC. OBJECTIVE: The present study was to explore the clinical significance of serum exosomal miR-484 in OC. METHODS: A total of 113 OC patients and 60 healthy volunteers were enrolled in this study. Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) was performed to measure serum exosomal miR-484 levels in blood samples. RESULTS: Our results showed that serum exosomal miR-484 levels were significantly lower in OC patients. Serum exosomal miR-484 was able to discriminate OC cases from controls, with an area under the receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) curve (AUC) of 0.821. Combination of serum exosomal miR-484 with CA-125 showed an elevated AUC of 0.912 in identifying OC patients from controls. Moreover, decreased serum exosomal miR-484 expression was significantly associated with aggressive clinical variables as well as shorter overall survival and progression-free survival. The OC patients with simultaneously low serum exosomal miR-484 expression and high serum CA-125 levels tended to suffer the worst clinical outcomes. The multivariate analysis confirmed that low serum exosomal miR-484 level was an independent indicator. CONCLUSIONS: Collectively, serum exosomal miR-484 could serve as a reliable and non-invasive marker for predicting the prognosis of OC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available