4.6 Article

Process evaluation of the Bristol girls dance project

Journal

BMC PUBLIC HEALTH
Volume 16, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12889-016-3010-4

Keywords

Physical activity intervention; Dance; Secondary school; Process evaluation; Adolescent; Girls

Funding

  1. National Institute for Health Research Public Health Research (NIHR PHR) Programme [11/3050/01]
  2. National Institute for Health Research CTU
  3. Centre for the Development and Evaluation of Complex Interventions for Public Health Improvement (DECIPHer), a UKCRC Public Health Research Centre of Excellence
  4. British Heart Foundation [MR/KO232331/1]
  5. Cancer Research UK [MR/KO232331/1]
  6. Economic and Social Research Council [MR/KO232331/1]
  7. Medical Research Council [MR/KO232331/1]
  8. Welsh Government [MR/KO232331/1]
  9. Wellcome Trust under the UK Clinical Research Collaboration [MR/KO232331/1]
  10. Bristol Primary Care Trust
  11. North Somerset Council
  12. Bath and North East Somerset Council
  13. Medical Research Council [MR/K023233/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  14. National Institute for Health Research [11/3050/01] Funding Source: researchfish
  15. MRC [MR/K023233/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The Bristol Girls Dance Project was a cluster randomised controlled trial that aimed to increase objectively measured moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) levels of Year 7 (age 11-12) girls through a dance-based after-school intervention. The intervention was delivered in nine schools and consisted of up to forty after-school dance sessions. This paper reports on the main findings from the detailed process evaluation that was conducted. Methods: Quantitative and qualitative data were collected from intervention schools. Dose and fidelity were reported by dance instructors at every session. Intervention dose was defined as attending two thirds of sessions and was measured by attendance registers. Fidelity to the intervention manual was reported by dance instructors. On four randomly-selected occasions, participants reported their perceived level of exertion and enjoyment. Reasons for non-attendance were self-reported at the end of the intervention. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with all dance instructors who delivered the intervention (n = 10) and school contacts (n = 9) in intervention schools. A focus group was conducted with girls who participated in each intervention school (n = 9). Results: The study did not affect girls' MVPA. An average of 31.7 girls participated in each school, with 9.1 per school receiving the intervention dose. Mean attendance and instructors' fidelity to the intervention manual decreased over time. The decline in attendance was largely attributed to extraneous factors common to after-school activities. Qualitative data suggest that the training and intervention manual were helpful to most instructors. Participant ratings of session enjoyment were high but perceived exertion was low, however, girls found parts of the intervention challenging. Conclusions: The intervention was enjoyed by participants. Attendance at the intervention sessions was low but typical of after-school activities. Participants reported that the intervention brought about numerous health and social benefits and improved their dance-based knowledge and skills. The intervention could be improved by reducing the number of girls allowed to participate in each school and providing longer and more in-depth training to those delivering the intervention.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available