4.7 Article

Negative allosteric modulators of the human calcium-sensing receptor bind to overlapping and distinct sites within the 7-transmembrane domain

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY
Volume 177, Issue 8, Pages 1917-1930

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/bph.14961

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institute of General Medical Sciences [GM117424]
  2. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases [AI118985]
  3. National Institute of Health General Medical Sciences [GM117424]
  4. Australian Research Council [DP170104228]
  5. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (NHMRC) [APP1085143, APP1138891]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background and Purpose Negative allosteric modulators (NAMs) that target the calcium-sensing receptor (CaS receptor) were originally developed for the treatment of osteoporosis by stimulating the release of endogenous parathyroid hormone, but failed in human clinical trials. Several chemically and structurally distinct NAM scaffolds have been described, but it is not known how these different scaffolds interact with the CaS receptor to inhibit receptor signalling in response to agonists. Experimental Approach In the present study, we used a mutagenesis approach combined with analytical pharmacology and computational modelling to probe the binding sites of four distinct NAM scaffolds. Key Results Although all four scaffolds bind to the 7-transmembrane and/or extracellular or intracellular loops, they occupy distinct regions, as previously shown for positive allosteric modulators of the CaS receptor. Furthermore, different NAM scaffolds mediate negative allosteric modulation via distinct amino acid networks. Conclusion and Implications These findings aid our understanding of how different NAMs bind to and inhibit the CaS receptor. Elucidation of allosteric binding sites in the CaS receptor has implications for the discovery of novel allosteric modulators.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available