4.7 Article

Detection and prognostic role of heterogeneous populations of melanoma circulating tumour cells

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 122, Issue 7, Pages 1059-1067

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s41416-020-0750-9

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) [1013349]
  2. Cancer Council WA (CCWA)
  3. CCWA Suzanne Cavanagh Early Career Investigator (2016)
  4. Edith Cowan University Early Career Research grant (2016)
  5. Cancer Research Trust
  6. CCWA
  7. Western Australian Health Translation Early Career Fellowship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Circulating tumour cells (CTCs) can be assessed through a minimally invasive blood sample with potential utility as a predictive, prognostic and pharmacodynamic biomarker. The large heterogeneity of melanoma CTCs has hindered their detection and clinical application. Methods Here we compared two microfluidic devices for the recovery of circulating melanoma cells. The presence of CTCs in 43 blood samples from patients with metastatic melanoma was evaluated using a combination of immunocytochemistry and transcript analyses of five genes by RT-PCR and 19 genes by droplet digital PCR (ddPCR), whereby a CTC score was calculated. Circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) from the same patient blood sample, was assessed by ddPCR targeting tumour-specific mutations. Results Our analysis revealed an extraordinary heterogeneity amongst melanoma CTCs, with multiple non-overlapping subpopulations. CTC detection using our multimarker approach was associated with shorter overall and progression-free survival. Finally, we found that CTC scores correlated with plasma ctDNA concentrations and had similar pharmacodynamic changes upon treatment initiation. Conclusions Despite the high phenotypic and molecular heterogeneity of melanoma CTCs, multimarker derived CTC scores could serve as viable tools for prognostication and treatment response monitoring in patients with metastatic melanoma.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available