4.7 Article

Nicotine exposure potentiates lung tumorigenesis by perturbing cellular surveillance

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 122, Issue 6, Pages 904-911

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s41416-020-0730-0

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81560189, 81260169]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Nicotine is a major tobacco component and found at circulating concentrations in smokers' bloodstreams. Although considered a non-carcinogenic substance, nicotine rapidly defuses to tissues after being inhaled, inviting effects on cellular physiology, particularly in the lung. Widespread increased use of nicotine-based e-cigarettes, especially in younger adults, creates an urgent need for improved understanding of nicotine's potential to impact human health. Methods Biological and biochemistry methods were used to interrogate the potential for nicotine to weaken the genetic integrity of murine and human-lung epithelial cells. Results We demonstrate that nicotine potentiates the growth of the lung epithelial cells in a dose-response fashion. Nicotine elicits an acute increase in reactive oxygen species (ROS), which persists at moderately high levels throughout the duration of nicotine exposure. The aberrant increases in ROS appear to induce ER stress and UPR activation, as reflected by BIP upregulation and PERK phosphorylation. Furthermore, prolonged nicotine exposure interferes with p53 function triggered by sodium arsenite. Unless p53 is suppressed, persistent nicotine exposure does not induce colony formation by lung epithelial cells in soft agar. Conclusion The data suggest that nicotine treatment, by perturbing intracellular redox state and altering p53 function, can create a pro-tumorigenic environment in lung epithelium. The results suggest caution in using nicotine replacement therapies and e-cigarettes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available