Journal
BMC PUBLIC HEALTH
Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages -Publisher
BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12889-019-7895-6
Keywords
Economy; Social determinants of health; Population health; Economic policy; Health inequalities; Macroeconomy; Public health; Regulation
Categories
Funding
- Wellcome Trust [106554/Z/14/Z, 215654/Z/19/Z]
- National Institute for Health Research lectureship
- NIHR Academic Clinical Fellowship [ACF-2015-21-024]
- Norwegian Research Council [288638]
- Fuse, the Centre for Translational Research in Public Health
- British Heart Foundation
- Cancer Research UK
- Economic and Social Research Council
- Medical Research Council [MR/K02325X/1]
- National Institute for Health Research under the UK Clinical Research Collaboration
- National Institute for Health Research Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care North West Coast (NIHR CLAHRC NWC)
- Wellcome Trust [215654/Z/19/Z, 106554/Z/14/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust
- Medical Research Council [MR/K02325X/1B, MR/K02325X/1] Funding Source: researchfish
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Background: The social determinants of health have been widely recognised yet there remains a lack of clarity regarding what constitute the macro-economic determinants of health and what can be done to address them. An umbrella review of systematic reviews was conducted to identify the evidence for the health and health inequalities impact of population level macroeconomic factors, strategies, policies and interventions. Methods: Nine databases were searched for systematic reviews meeting the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE) criteria using a novel conceptual framework. Studies were assessed for quality using a standardised instrument and a narrative overview of the findings is presented. Results: The review found a large (n = 62) but low quality systematic review-level evidence base. The results indicated that action to promote employment and improve working conditions can help improve health and reduce gender-based health inequalities. Evidence suggests that market regulation of tobacco, alcohol and food is likely to be effective at improving health and reducing inequalities in health including strong taxation, or restriction of advertising and availability. Privatisation of utilities and alcohol sectors, income inequality, and economic crises are likely to increase health inequalities. Left of centre governments and welfare state generosity may have a positive health impact, but evidence on specific welfare interventions is mixed. Trade and trade policies were found to have a mixed effect. There were no systematic reviews of the health impact of monetary policy or of large economic institutions such as central banks and regulatory organisations. Conclusions: The results of this study provide a simple yet comprehensive framework to support policy-makers and practitioners in addressing the macroeconomic determinants of health. Further research is needed in low and middle income countries and further reviews are needed to summarise evidence in key gaps identified by this review.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available