4.5 Article

Trans-ethnic meta-analysis of rare variants in sequencing association studies

Journal

BIOSTATISTICS
Volume 22, Issue 4, Pages 706-722

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxz061

Keywords

Effect-size heterogeneity; genome-wide association study; Kernel regression; Random effect model; Rare variants; Trans-ethnic meta-analysis

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01 HG008773, R01 HG009976]
  2. Rackham Predoctoral Fellowship from the University of Michigan

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cross-ethnic meta-analysis is a powerful tool for detecting novel loci in genetic association studies. The proposed score test under a modified random effects model considers genetic similarity across populations and controls type I error rates while increasing power in the presence of heterogeneity.
Trans-ethnic meta-analysis is a powerful tool for detecting novel loci in genetic association studies. However, in the presence of heterogeneity among different populations, existing gene-/region-based rare variants meta-analysis methods may be unsatisfactory because they do not consider genetic similarity or dissimilarity among different populations. In response, we propose a score test under the modified random effects model for gene-/region-based rare variants associations. We adapt the kernel regression framework to construct the model and incorporate genetic similarities across populations into modeling the heterogeneity structure of the genetic effect coefficients. We use a resampling-based copula method to approximate asymptotic distribution of the test statistic, enabling efficient estimation of p-values. Simulation studies show that our proposed method controls type I error rates and increases power over existing approaches in the presence of heterogeneity. We illustrate our method by analyzing T2D-GENES consortium exome sequence data to explore rare variant associations with several traits.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available