4.7 Review

Approaches to Defining Common and Dissociable Neurobiological Deficits Associated With Psychopathology in Youth

Journal

BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY
Volume 88, Issue 1, Pages 51-62

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2019.12.015

Keywords

Adolescents; Heterogeneity; Imaging; Neurobiology; Psychopathology; Youth

Funding

  1. National Institute of Mental Health [K99MH117274, R01MH107703, R01MH113550, R01MH120482, R01NS085211, R01MH112847]
  2. Lifespan Brain Institute at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and Penn Medicine
  3. National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression Young Investigator Award

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Psychiatric disorders show high rates of comorbidity and nonspecificity of presenting clinical symptoms, while demonstrating substantial heterogeneity within diagnostic categories. Notably, many of these psychiatric disorders first manifest in youth. We review progress and next steps in efforts to parse heterogeneity in psychiatric symptoms in youths by identifying abnormalities within neural circuits. To address this fundamental challenge in psychiatry, a number of methods have been proposed. We provide an overview of these methods, broadly organized into dimensional versus categorical approaches and single-view versus multiview approaches. Dimensional approaches including factor analysis and canonical correlation analysis aim to capture dimensional associations between psychopathology and brain measures across a continuous spectrum from health to disease. In contrast, categorical approaches, such as clustering and community detection, aim to identify subtypes of individuals within a class of symptoms or brain features. We highlight several studies that apply these methods to samples of youths and discuss issues to consider when using these approaches. Finally, we end by highlighting avenues for future research.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available