4.2 Article

Transcriptomics illuminate the phylogenetic backbone of tiger beetles

Journal

BIOLOGICAL JOURNAL OF THE LINNEAN SOCIETY
Volume 129, Issue 3, Pages 740-751

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/biolinnean/blz195

Keywords

aTRAM; beetle phylogenomics; Carabidae; Cicindelidae; codon position saturation; RNA preservation; tiger beetle evolution

Funding

  1. University of Florida Biology Graduate Student Association
  2. Florida Museum of Natural History travel grants

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Phylogenomics is progressing rapidly, allowing large strides forward into our understanding of the tree of life. In this study, we generated transcriptomes from ethanol-preserved specimens of 13 tiger beetle species (Coleoptera: Cicindelinae) and one Scaritinae outgroup. From these 14 transcriptomes and seven publicly available transcriptomes, we recovered an average of 2538 loci for phylogenetic analysis. We constructed an evolutionary tree of tiger beetles to examine deep-level relationships and examined the extent to which the composition of the dataset, missing data, gene tree inconsistency and codon position saturation impacted phylogenetic accuracy. Ethanol-preserved specimens yielded similar numbers of loci to specimens originally preserved in costly reagents, showcasing more flexibility in transcriptomics than anticipated. The number of loci and gene tree inconsistency had less impact on downstream results than third codon position saturation and missing data. Our results recovered tiger beetles as sister to Carabidae with strong support, confirming their taxonomic status as an independent family within Adephaga. Within tiger beetles, phylogenetic relationships were robust across all nodes. This new phylogenomic backbone represents a useful framework for future endeavours in tiger beetle systematics and serves as a starting point for the development of less costly target capture toolkits to expand the taxonomic breadth of the future tiger beetle tree of life.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available