Journal
BIOACOUSTICS-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SOUND AND ITS RECORDING
Volume 30, Issue 3, Pages 303-323Publisher
TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/09524622.2020.1730240
Keywords
Autonomous recording unit; bird surveys; distance estimation; limited-radius surveys; sound level; population monitoring
Categories
Funding
- Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada [CRDPJ 469943-14]
- Alberta-Pacific Forest Industries
- Cenovus Energy
- ConocoPhillips Canada
- Canadian Natural Resources
- Suncor Energy
- Alberta Biodiversity Monitoring Institute
- NSERC
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The researchers proposed a method to restrict detections within a pre-specified survey radius by using sound level thresholds, aiming to address uncertainty regarding species-habitat associations in patchy habitats. By applying logistic regression to select sound level thresholds corresponding to desired distance thresholds, the method efficiently increased the percentage of detections within the desired survey areas.
Bioacoustic recordings are often used to conduct auditory surveys, in which human listeners identify vocalising animals on recordings. In these surveys, animals are typically counted regardless of their distance from the survey point. When these surveys are carried out in patchy habitat or near edges, detected individuals may frequently occur in a different land-cover type than the survey point itself, which introduces uncertainty regarding species-habitat associations. We propose a method to restrict detections from single microphones to within a pre-specified survey radius. The method uses logistic regression to select a sound level threshold corresponding to the desired distance threshold. We applied this method to acoustic data from the centre of 21 1-ha oil wellsites in northern Alberta. To compare our approach with the results from auditory surveys from the same locations, we used sound localisation to locate birds detected via both methods. Just 22.4% of birds detected on auditory surveys fell within the desired survey area. Using our distance-truncation method, 96% of detections were within the desired survey area. We propose that distance truncation via sound level will be useful for surveys of patchily distributed habitat, or when greater certainty about bird locations or habitat associations is desired.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available