4.2 Article

The effect of anthropogenic noise and weather conditions on male calls in the bladder grasshopper Bullacris unicolor

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/09524622.2019.1703818

Keywords

Anthropogenic noise; bioacoustics; passive acoustic monitoring; Pneumoridae

Categories

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation (NRF) of South Africa [93964, 111095]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated call parameter differences in the bladder grasshopper inhabiting two sites with different noise levels. Results showed that higher noise levels led to increased call intervals, lower peak frequencies, and decreased call numbers. Grasshoppers adjusted their calling timing in response to noise levels, shifting calls later in the night at noisier sites.
Acoustic communication in animals relies upon specific contexts and environments for effective signal transmission. Increasing anthropogenic noise pollution and different weather conditions can disrupt acoustic communication. In this study, we investigated call parameter differences in the bladder grasshopper Bullacris unicolor inhabiting two sites in close proximity to each other that differed in their noise levels. Calling activity was monitored via passive acoustic recorders. Weather conditions, including wind speed, temperature and humidity, were also recorded. We found that the interval between successive calls increased with higher noise levels at both sites, and the peak frequency became lower. The total number of calls detected also decreased with anthropogenic noise, but this relationship was only evident at the noisier site. In addition, grasshoppers shifted the timing of their calls to later in the night at the noisier site, possibly to take advantage of relatively lower noise levels. We also found that weather conditions, particularly temperature, had a significant influence on call parameters. Further studies are thus needed to disentangle the effects of anthropogenic noise and environmental variables on calling activity in this species. Our results lend support to the growing concern regarding the effects of noise pollution on animal acoustic signalling systems and also highlight the complexity of factors which affect sound signalling in natural environments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available