4.8 Review

The biocathode of microbial electrochemical systems and microbially-influenced corrosion

Journal

BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
Volume 190, Issue -, Pages 395-401

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.04.084

Keywords

Biocathode; Bioelectrochemical systems; Microbially-influenced corrosion; Microbial electrolysis cells; Energy conservation

Funding

  1. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
  2. Malaysian Government [AP-2014-016]
  3. Fundamental Research Grant Scheme [FRGS/1/2014/TK06/UKM/03/1]
  4. Chinese Government 1000-Talents Plan with the Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Urumqi, China
  5. Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea through Cooperative Research Program for Agriculture Science and Technology Development [PJ0108242015]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The cathode reaction is one of the most important limiting factors in bioelectrochemical systems even with precious metal catalysts. Since aerobic bacteria have a much higher affinity for oxygen than any known abiotic cathode catalysts, the performance of a microbial fuel cell can be improved through the use of electrochemically-active oxygen-reducing bacteria acting as the cathode catalyst. These consume electrons available from the electrode to reduce the electron acceptors present, probably conserving energy for growth. Anaerobic bacteria reduce protons to hydrogen in microbial electrolysis cells (MECs). These aerobic and anaerobic bacterial activities resemble those catalyzing microbially-influenced corrosion (MIC). Sulfate-reducing bacteria and homoacetogens have been identified in MEC biocathodes. For sustainable operation, microbes in a biocathode should conserve energy during such electron-consuming reactions probably by similar mechanisms as those occurring in MIC. A novel hypothesis is proposed here which explains how energy can be conserved by microbes in MEC biocathodes. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available