4.5 Article

Prevalence of lumbar spondylosis and its association with low back pain among community-dwelling Japanese women

Journal

BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS
Volume 17, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BIOMED CENTRAL LTD
DOI: 10.1186/s12891-016-1343-x

Keywords

Lumbar spondylosis; Epidemiology; Community-based study; Low back pain

Funding

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [15H04432] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Lumbar spondylosis is more prevalent among the middle-aged and elderly, but few population-based studies have been conducted, especially in Japan. The purpose of this study was to explore the prevalence of lumbar spondylosis and its associations with low back pain among community-dwelling Japanese women. Methods: Lateral radiographs of the lumbar spine were obtained from 490 Japanese women >= 40 years old, and scored for lumbar spondylosis using the Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grade at lumbar intervertebral level from L1/2 to L5/S1. Height and weight were measured, and body mass index (BMI) was calculated. Low back pain in subjects was assessed using a self-administered questionnaire. Stiffness index (bone mass) was measured at the calcaneal bone using quantitative ultrasound. Results: Prevalence of radiographic lumbar spondylosis for KL >= 2, KL >= 3 and low back pain were 76.7%, 38.8% and 20.0%, respectively. Age was positively associated with radiographic lumbar spondylosis (KL = 2, KL >= 3) and low back pain. Greater BMI was associated with lumbar spondylosis with KL = 2, but not with KL >= 3. Stiffness index was associated with neither radiographic lumbar spondylosis nor low back pain. Multiple logistic regression analysis identified radiographic lumbar spondylosis (KL >= 3) at L3/4, L4/5 and L5/S1 was associated with low back pain, independent of age, BMI and stiffness index. Conclusion: Severe lumbar spondylosis at the middle or lower level may contribute to low back pain.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available