4.7 Article

Excitation emission matrix fluorescence spectroscopy for combustion generated particulate matter source identification

Journal

ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT
Volume 220, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.117065

Keywords

Fluorescence; Source apportionment; Particulate matter; Diesel; Woodsmoke; Neural network

Funding

  1. National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering, United States (NIBIB) [U01 EB021923]
  2. Data Intensive Research Enabling Clean Technology (DIRECT) NSF National Research Traineeship, United States [DGE-1633216]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The inhalation of particulate matter (PM) is a significant health risk associated with reduced life expectancy due to increased cardio-pulmonary disease and exacerbation of respiratory diseases such as asthma and pneumonia. PM originates from natural and anthropogenic sources including combustion engines, cigarettes, agricultural burning, and forest fires. Identifying the source of PM can inform effective mitigation strategies and policies, but this is difficult to do using current techniques. Here we present a method for identifying PM source using excitation emission matrix (EEM) fluorescence spectroscopy and a machine learning algorithm. We collected combustion generated PM2.5 from wood burning, diesel exhaust, and cigarettes using filters. Filters were weighted to determine mass concentration followed by extraction into cyclohexane and analysis by EEM fluorescence spectroscopy. Spectra obtained from each source served as training data for a convolutional neural network (CNN) used for source identification in mixed samples. This method can predict the presence or absence of the three laboratory sources with an overall accuracy of 89% when the threshold for classifying a source as present is 1.1 mu g/m(3) in air over a 24-h sampling time. The limit of detection for cigarette, diesel and wood are 0.7, 2.6, 0.9 mu g/m(3), respectively, in air assuming a 24-h sampling time at an air sampling rate of 1.8 L per minute. We applied the CNN algorithm developed using the laboratory training data to a small set of field samples and found the algorithm was effective in some cases but would require a training data set containing more samples to be more broadly applicable.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available