4.7 Article

Quantitative arrangement of Si/Al ratio of natural zeolite using acid treatment

Journal

APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE
Volume 498, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.143874

Keywords

Quantitative arrangement; SiO2/Al2O3 ratio; Hydrophilicity/hydrophobicity; Acid treatment

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51604170]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2016M602936XB]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Shaanxi Province [2018JM5025]
  4. Foundation for Selected Overseas Chinese Scholar [2018043]
  5. Shaanxi Province Postdoctoral Science Foundation
  6. Wenzhou Science and Technology Foundation of China [S20180008]
  7. National Undergraduate Innovation and Entrepreneurship Training Program [201810708042]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Acid treatment is an effective way to arrange SiO2/Al2O3 ratio of natural zeolite. However, limited researches have been done on quantitative regulation of SiO2/Al2O3 ratio of natural zeolite. In this paper, an orthogonal test was designed to optimize the acid treated conditions. Acid concentration, treated time and temperature were then employed to quantitatively arrange the SiO2/Al2O3 ratio of natural zeolite, respectively. The results showed that the primary and secondary factors of acid treatment were acid treated time, acid concentration and acid treated temperature, respectively. The extent of dealumination of zeolite and its corresponding SiO2/Al2O3 ratio of natural zeolite could rise up to 98.4% and 372.7 under the optimized condition for 48 h, 8M and 70 degrees C, respectively. Acid concentration, treated time and temperature could effective quantitatively arrange the extent of dealumination of zeolite and SiO2/Al2O3 ratio of natural zeolite. The as-prepared acid treated zeolites with different SiO2/Al2O3 ratio regulated by acid concentration had higher specific surface area, micropore volume, silanol group content and hydrophobicity than those for the natural zeolite.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available