4.6 Article

Influence of oxophilic behavior of UiO-66(Ce) metal-organic framework with superior catalytic performance in Friedel-Crafts alkylation reaction

Journal

APPLIED ORGANOMETALLIC CHEMISTRY
Volume 34, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/aoc.5578

Keywords

heterogeneous catalysis; metal-organic frameworks; solid Lewis acids; UiO-66(Ce); UiO-66(Zr)

Funding

  1. Science and Engineering Research Board [EMR/2016/006500]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In recent years, one of the analogous metal organic frameworks (MOFs) with UiO-66(Zr) topology receiving wider attention is UiO-66(Ce), which exhibits interesting properties and high thermal and chemical stability. Hence, in the present work, UiO-66(Ce) is synthesized by adopting an earlier procedure and characterized by series of spectroscopic techniques like UV-visible (UV-Vis), Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR), Raman and scanning electron microscope (SEM) to confirm its structural features and crystallinity using powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) and these results are in close agreement with other reports. The catalytic performance of UiO-66(Ce) was evaluated in the Friedel-Crafts alkylation reaction between beta-nitrostyrene and indole to obtain heterocyclic compounds with biological activity. A series of control experiments indicate that Ce4+ located within the framework plays an important role in promoting this reaction and its activity is found to be much superior to that of UiO-66(Zr). This enhanced activity with Ce4+ compared to Zr4+ is attributed due to the higher oxophilicity of Ce4+, which can readily bind with an oxygen-containing substrate such as beta-nitrostyrene. The leaching test confirms the heterogeneity of the reaction and the catalyst can be reused three times with identical activity to the fresh solid. UiO-66(Ce) shows wide substrate scope with high yields of the desired product. A proposed mechanism is also discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available