4.8 Article

Robust bioenergy technologies for the German heat transition: A novel approach combining optimization modeling with Sobol' sensitivity analysis

Journal

APPLIED ENERGY
Volume 262, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.114534

Keywords

Heat sector; Bioenergy; Optimization; Sensitivity analysis; Sobol'

Funding

  1. Bundesministerium fur Wirtschaft und Energie [03KB113B]
  2. Helmholtz Association of German Research Centers
  3. Helmholtz Impulse and Networking Fund through Helmholtz Interdisciplinary Graduate School for Environmental Research (HIGRADE)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Uncertainties are one of the major challenges of energy system optimization models (ESOM), yet little use is made of systematic uncertainty assessments in ESOM-based analyses. In this paper, an ESOM is combined with the global sensitivity analysis of Sobol' to identify robust, competitive bioenergy technologies to fulfill the climate targets in the German heat sector under uncertain developments. Through the outlined method, only three out of 32 investigated parameters were identified to have uncertainties with significant impacts on the future competitiveness of bioenergy technologies: the power price, gas price and the defined climate target. Based on these findings, a solution space is quantified showing which bioenergy technologies are robust, competitive options under the uncertainty of the three influencing parameters. The use of biomass in the form of wood chips in (high temperature) industry applications is found to be the most robust choice in all cases, while hybrid combined heat and power wood pellet systems are an additional robust option when future power prices are increasing. Both technologies have the potential to close gaps in a sustainable energy system and should be considered for the future use of biomass in the German heat sector, when designing policies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available