4.8 Article

Model and observation of dispatchable region for flexible distribution network

Journal

APPLIED ENERGY
Volume 261, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114425

Keywords

Soft open points; Flexible distribution network; Dispatchable region; Model; Observation

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFB0900100]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51877144]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Soft open points (SOPs), defined as the power electronic devices installed to replace normally open points in distribution network, can improve the flexibility of power control and thus further enhance the reliability and economy of power grids. Flexible distribution network (FDN) is a system-level concept to describe the distribution network equipped with multiple SOPs. Region method is to describe the secure range of the system operating in a geometric view. This paper adopts the region method to observe FDN for the first time. Firstly, the model of dispatchable region of FDN is proposed. The constraints of region space are formulated, considering SOPs, power flow, thermal capacity and voltage profile. Secondly, a simulation-based observation approach is also proposed to obtain the region projections on 2D and 3D sub-space. To illustrate the approach clearly, 2 small cases are given preceding a 7-feeders IEEE RBTS case. The region projections of case grids are observed and their topological characteristics are compared with those of traditional distribution network (TDN). The results indicate that FDN has advantages over traditional distribution network in operation security. For example, the region projections of FDN on 2-dimensional sub-space are about 2-4 times larger than those of TDN with the same network topology. The dispatchable region can be further developed into a useful tool for the secure and high-efficient operation of FDN in the future.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available