4.3 Article

Prevalence and Risk Factors for Oral HPV in Healthy Population, in Central Europe

Journal

ANTICANCER RESEARCH
Volume 40, Issue 3, Pages 1597-1604

Publisher

INT INST ANTICANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.14107

Keywords

Oral HPV prevalence; HPV antibodies; healthy population; oropharyngeal cancer

Categories

Funding

  1. Grant Agency of the 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague [114216]
  2. Agency for Medical Research of the Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic [17-28055A]
  3. Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic within the National Sustainability Program II (BIOCEV-FAR project), Charles University, Prague [LQ1604]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background/Aim: The incidence of oropharyngeal tumours induced by human papillomaviruses (HPV) is ever increasing. Information about oral HPV prevalence and its risk factors are very important for future screening and early diagnosis of the disease. The present study aimed to assess oral HPV prevalence in healthy population and risk factors for HPV infection, since this data is scarce or even missing in Central Europe. Patients and Methods: HPV prevalence in oral rinse and HPV-specific antibodies in peripheral blood were investigated in two groups of healthy participants. Group I consisted of 294 students who reached sexual maturity after the HPV vaccine had been licensed with mean age 23.2 years, and Group II of 215 unvaccinated participants with the mean age 55.7 years. Additionally, the risk factors were evaluated. Results: In Group I, 2% of participants were positive for oral HPV DNA. A statistically significantly higher rate (8.8%) was found in Group II. The seropositivity rates for anamnestic HPV antibodies were comparable in both groups. None of the analysed risk factors was significantly associated with oral HPV positivity. Conclusion: The lower prevalence of oral HPV DNA in younger participants suggests the positive influence of vaccination against oral HPV.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available