4.7 Review Book Chapter

Modeling Plant Metabolism: From Network Reconstruction to Mechanistic Models

Journal

ANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT BIOLOGY, VOL 71, 2020
Volume 71, Issue -, Pages 303-326

Publisher

ANNUAL REVIEWS
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-050718-100221

Keywords

plant metabolism; metabolic flux; flux balance analysis; systems biology

Categories

Funding

  1. US Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences through the Physical Biosciences program of the Chemical Sciences, Geosciences and Biosciences Division [DE-SC0012704]
  2. DOE Center for Advanced Bioenergy and Bioproducts Innovation (US DOE, Office of Science, Office of Biological and Environmental Research) [DE-SC0018420]
  3. National Science Foundation [MCB-1519083]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mathematical modeling of plant metabolism enables the plant science community to understand the organization of plant metabolism, obtain quantitative insights into metabolic functions, and derive engineering strategies for manipulation of metabolism. Among the various modeling approaches, metabolic pathway analysis can dissect the basic functional modes of subsections of core metabolism, such as photorespiration, and reveal how classical definitions ofmetabolic pathways have overlapping functionality. In the many studies using constraint-based modeling in plants, numerous computational tools are currently available to analyze large-scale and genome-scale metabolic networks. For C-13-metabolic flux analysis, principles of isotopic steady state have been used to study heterotrophic plant tissues, while nonstationary isotope labeling approaches are amenable to the study of photoautotrophic and secondary metabolism. Enzyme kinetic models explore pathways in mechanistic detail, and we discuss different approaches to determine or estimate kinetic parameters. In this review, we describe recent advances and challenges in modeling plant metabolism.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available