4.7 Article

How Many Steps Per Day are Necessary to Prevent Postoperative Complications Following Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgeries for Malignancy?

Journal

ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 27, Issue 5, Pages 1387-1397

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-08218-x

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose The current study was designed to investigate the association between the average preoperative physical activity and postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing surgeries for hepato-pancreato-biliary (HPB) malignancy. Methods Patients who were scheduled to undergo open abdominal surgeries for HPB malignancies (major hepatectomy, pancreatoduodenectomy, or hepato-pancreatoduodenectomy) between 2016 and 2017 were included. The average steps per day were recorded by a pedometer and calculated for each patient during the preoperative waiting period. Physical activity levels were classified according to the average number of daily steps as poor (< 5000 steps/day) and good (>= 5000 steps/day). Results Of the 105 eligible patients, 78 met the inclusion criteria. The median number of steps per day was 6174. There were 48 patients (62%) with good physical activity and 30 patients (38%) with poor physical activity. Patients with poor physical activity revealed a significantly higher rate of major complications with Clavien grade >= 3 (63% vs. 35%, p = 0.016), a higher rate of infectious complications (53% vs. 23%, p = 0.006), and a longer postoperative hospital stay (median, 30 vs. 21 days, p < 0.001) compared with those with good physical activity. After a multivariate analysis, poor physical activity was identified as an independent risk factor for the development of major complications (odds ratio, 2.842, p = 0.042) and infectious complications (odds ratio, 3.844, p = 0.007). Conclusions The current study demonstrated that preoperative physical activity levels are associated with the incidence of major postoperative complications following HPB surgery for malignancy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available