4.8 Article

Biohythane production from marine macroalgae Sargassum sp coupling dark fermentation and anaerobic digestion

Journal

BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
Volume 190, Issue -, Pages 251-256

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.04.052

Keywords

Biohythane; Marine biomass; Sargassum sp.; Biohydrogen; Caldicellulosiruptor saccharolyticus

Funding

  1. Portuguese Science Foundation (FCT)
  2. European Social Fund (ESF, POPH-QREN ) [SFRH/BPD/82000/2011, SFRH/BDP/48962/2008]
  3. FEDER [FCOMP-01-0124-FEDER-027914 (PTDC/AAG-TEC/3048/2012)]
  4. FCT Strategic Project [PEst-OE/EQB/LA0023/2013]
  5. FCT Project [RECI/BBB-EBI/0179/2012]
  6. Project BioEnv - Biotechnology and Bioengineering for a sustainable world [NORTE-07-0124-FEDER-000048]
  7. Programa Operacional Regional do Norte
  8. QREN
  9. FEDER
  10. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [PTDC/AAG-TEC/3048/2012] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Potential biohythane production from Sargassum sp. was evaluated in a two stage process. In the first stage, hydrogen dark fermentation was performed by Caldicellulosiruptor saccharolyticus. Sargassum sp. concentrations (VS) of 2.5, 4.9 and 7.4 g L-1 and initial inoculum concentrations (CDW) of 0.04 and 0.09 g L-1 of C. saccharolyticus were used in substrate/ inoculum ratios ranging from 28 to 123. The end products from hydrogen production process were subsequently used for biogas production. The highest hydrogen and methane production yields, 91.3 +/- 3.3 L kg(-1) and 541 +/- 10 L kg(-1), respectively, were achieved with 2.5 g L-1 of Sargassum sp. (VS) and 0.09 g L(-1)of inoculum (CDW). The biogas produced contained 14-20% of hydrogen. Potential energy production from Sargassum sp. in two stage process was estimated in 242 GJ ha(-1) yr(-1). A maximum energy supply of 600 EJ yr(-1) could be obtained from the ocean potential area for macroalgae production. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available