4.4 Article

Impact of atopic dermatitis treatment on child and parent sleep, daytime functioning, and quality of life

Journal

ANNALS OF ALLERGY ASTHMA & IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 124, Issue 4, Pages 385-392

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.anai.2019.12.024

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Eczema Association

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a common childhood disorder that is associated with a variety of negative health outcomes in children and parents, including poor sleep and daytime functioning. Despite this, few studies have examined the impact of treatment for AD on sleep, and even fewer have included validated sleep questionnaires, child report of sleep disturbance, or objective measures of sleep. Objective: To address limitations in the literature by examining objective and subjective reports of sleep, as well as measures of daytime functioning before and after admission to an intensive treatment program for AD. Methods: Twenty-nine parent-child dyads who presented to an intensive day treatment program participated in this study. Sleep was objectively measured with 1 week of actigraphy both 1 week before admission and 1 month after discharge. Subjective questionnaires of sleep, daytime functioning, and quality of life were completed by children and parents at admission, discharge, 1 month after discharge, and 3 months after discharge. Results: Study results highlight the benefit of the treatment program on reducing AD severity, as well as improvements in objectively measured sleep duration and efficiency, self-reported measures of sleep, daytime functioning, and quality of life in children and parents up to 3 months after discharge. Conclusion: This study highlights the importance of treatment for child AD on both child and parent health outcomes. (C) 2020 American College of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available