4.8 Article

The Limited Predictive Power of the Pauling Rules

Journal

ANGEWANDTE CHEMIE-INTERNATIONAL EDITION
Volume 59, Issue 19, Pages 7569-7575

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/anie.202000829

Keywords

computational chemistry; coordination environments; materials informatics; solid-state structures

Funding

  1. European Unions Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant [837910]
  2. Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique (F.R.S.-FNRS Belgium) through the PdR [T.1071.15 -HTBaSE]
  3. F.R.S.-FNRS
  4. Marie Curie Actions (MSCA) [837910] Funding Source: Marie Curie Actions (MSCA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Pauling rules have been used for decades to rationalise the crystal structures of ionic compounds. Despite their importance, there has been no statistical assessment of the performances of these five empirical rules so far. Here, we rigorously and automatically test all five Pauling rules for a large data set of around 5000 known oxides. We discuss each Pauling rule separately, stressing their limits and range of application in terms of chemistries and structures. We conclude that only 13 % of the oxides simultaneously satisfy the last four rules, indicating a much lower predictive power than expected.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available