4.8 Article

DirectMS1: MS/MS-Free Identification of 1000 Proteins of Cellular Proteomes in 5 Minutes

Journal

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 92, Issue 6, Pages 4326-4333

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.9b05095

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Russian Science Foundation [19-74-00123]
  2. European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union [646603]
  3. VILLUM Center for Bioanalytical Sciences at the University of Southern Denmark
  4. European Research Council (ERC) [646603] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)
  5. Russian Science Foundation [19-74-00123] Funding Source: Russian Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Proteome characterization relies heavily on tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) and is thus associated with instrumentation complexity, lengthy analysis time, and limited duty cycle. It was always tempting to implement approaches that do not require MS/MS, yet they were constantly failing to achieve a meaningful depth of quantitative proteome coverage within short experimental times, which is particularly important for clinical or biomarker-discovery applications. Here, we report on the first successful attempt to develop a truly MS/MS-free method, DirectMS1, for bottom-up proteomics. The method is compared with the standard MS/MS-based data-dependent acquisition approach for proteome-wide analysis using 5 min LC gradients. Specifically, we demonstrate identification of 1 000 protein groups for a standard HeLa cell line digest. The amount of loaded sample was varied in a range from 1 to 500 ng, and the method demonstrated 10-fold higher sensitivity. Combined with the recently introduced Diffacto approach for relative protein quantification, DirectMS1 outperforms most popular MS/MS-based label-free quantitation approaches because of significantly higher protein sequence coverage.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available