4.8 Article

Improved Single-Cell Proteome Coverage Using Narrow-Bore Packed NanoLC Columns and Ultrasensitive Mass Spectrometry

Journal

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 92, Issue 3, Pages 2665-2671

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.9b04631

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIH [R21 EB020976, R33 CA225248]
  2. Department of Energy's Office of Biological and Environmental Research

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Single-cell proteomics can provide unique insights into biological processes by resolving heterogeneity that is obscured by bulk measurements. Gains in the overall sensitivity and proteome coverage through improvements in sample processing and analysis increase the information content obtained from each cell, particularly for less abundant proteins. Here we report on improved single-cell proteome coverage through the combination of the previously developed nanoPOTS platform with further miniaturization of liquid chromatography (LC) separations and implementation of an ultrasensitive latest generation mass spectrometer. Following nanoPOTS sample preparation, protein digests from single cells were separated using a 20 mu m i.d. in-house-packed nanoLC column. Separated peptides were ionized using an etched fused-silica emitter capable of stable operation at the similar to 20 nL/min flow rate provided by the LC separation. Ultrasensitive LC-MS analysis was achieved using the Orbitrap Eclipse Tribrid mass spectrometer. An average of 362 protein groups were identified by tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) from single HeLa cells, and 874 protein groups were identified using the Match Between Runs feature of MaxQuant. This represents an >70% increase in label-free proteome coverage for single cells relative to previous efforts using larger bore (30 mu m i.d.) LC columns coupled to a previous-generation Orbitrap Fusion Lumos mass spectrometer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available