4.7 Article

Determination of trace rare earth elements in rock samples including meteorites by ICP-MS coupled with isotope dilution and comparison methods

Journal

ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA
Volume 1101, Issue -, Pages 81-89

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2019.12.031

Keywords

Rare earth elements; Inductively-coupled plasma mass spectrometry; Isotope dilution mass spectrometry; Internal standard elements; Geological reference sample; Meteorite

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Science and Technology (MEXT), Japan [19340169]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [19340169] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Combining isotope dilution mass spectrometry with a calibration method and choosing appropriate internal standard elements, 14 lanthanides (rare earth elements, REEs) were precisely and accurately determined for rock samples by using quadruple ICP-MS instruments. An enriched spike of Sm-149 was used to determine Sm content by an isotope dilution method. Simultaneously, Sm content was determined by a calibration method and the ratio of the two Sm values was used for correcting the preparation loss of the other REEs, which were analyzed only by a calibration method. Indium and TI were chosen for use as internal standard elements. Applying the procedure developed in this study to the homogenized Allende meteorite powder sample prepared by the Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D. C., US and several geological reference samples issued by the Geological Survey of Japan and the US geological Survey, precision and accuracy of the data obtained were evaluated and the accuracy was found to be equivalent to isotope dilution values obtained by thermal ionization mass spectrometry. Rare earth element concentrations in several meteorite samples were determined, and results indicate that our procedure is appropriate for a wide variety of whole rock compositions. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available